12. MATCHING WAVE And CORPUSCULAR QUANTUM MECHANICS
Indeterminacy relation of the Heisenberg.
Let's record angular momentum of a particle on a screw trajectory.
= mVr (1) also we shall take into
account impulse of a particle (P = mV):
=Pr (2). On a law of conservation of
angular momentum it can not vary for an insulated system. Therefore, if we shall
change impulse on value DP, we shall receive
change of radius of a screw trajectory Dr, i.e:
=DPDr (3), and it also is
an indeterminacy relation. But in the begining of past century by a problem
number one was erase classic mechanics, determinism and on - fast to exchange
by all this new fabrications. Therefore for pleasure of the fathers of a
quantum mechanics the Heisenberg put under them of cat in a bag (frank fraud in
act). In (3) he substitutes Dr on Dx, where x - coordinate of a particle (thus the dimension
(3) does not vary). Determinism at once has ceased to exist and the probabilistic
behavior of microparticles has triumphed. Behind blusterous delights in this
occasion the men of science have not found time to not doubt at all of that
obvious nonsense, in which one results an indeterminacy relation. But it few
more. Let's multiply and is divide a right member (2) on V and we shall
substitute a constant of the Planck as h/2p =,
then we shall receive:
h=mV2×2pr/V (4). But mV2=mV2/2+mV2/2 it is the sum of kinetic energy of translational motion of a particle and universal potential energy of repulsing, i.e. it is a total energy of a particle E. 2pr/V is a time of one revolution (t) on a screw trajectory. Therefore (4) it is possible to record as: h = Et, but allowing, that this product permanently, we shall receive other form of an indeterminacy relation:
h = DEDt (5). For naive venerators the quantum mechanics (5) can be copied as h£DEDt, that at all did not remain of any doubts in uncertainty. Hurrah! Now generations of the scientists will swallow delirium, bound with virtual particles, physical vacuum, polarization of vacuum and other nonsenses.
Motion of a particle at the bottom potential wells with flat bottom.
Official outcome:
E=p2×2×n2/2ml2 (1), where l - length of a
pit. If we is representable model, dispossessed everyone physical sense, when
the particle is mirrored from a wall of a pit and interferes with itself with
formation of standing wave, we shall receive precisely same outcome.
Motion of a particle in a potential well with energy loss.
For this problem the fixed Schrodinger equation does not approach. The potential energy of a particle permanently varies in time, and the solution of a general Schrodinger equation is so difficult, that it is not meaningless with them to fiddle around even to orthodoxes. Therefore official solution of this problem is not present. But new physics tenders the simple solution. Let there is a potential well as the cylinder by an altitude h0 with flat bottom. Let's take a bead of mass m and we shall release it from an altitude h0 without initial velocity. If the energy losses miss, the bead will be indefinitely to jump, each time returning in initial point. In this case total energy of a bead remain always numerically equal E0, passing from potential in kinetic and back. Apparently, to achieve bottom of a potential well, the bead should lose energy:
E0=mgh0 (1), where g - acceleration of gravity. Let's suspect, that at each shock about bottom of the cylinder the bead will lose a definite fraction K from initial energy. Then:
E1=mgh1=mgh0(1-K) (2). At i-th recoil:
Ei=E0(1-K)n (3). If instead of a bead the electron will jump, for both cases we shall receive the same expression for bond energy:
Etie=Ei-E0=-E0(1-1/n2) (3). The levels of energy are inspissated near to bottom of a potential well. At each recoil from bottom of a potential well the electron beams photons at the expense of a Bremsstrahlung.
Tunnel effect.
Official physics very much loves to kick classic that in it there are no fabrications of a quantum mechanics. Now I properly kick official physics that it has not physical sense.
By consideration of a tunnel effect official physics is compelled to enable a reflection coefficient from a wall of a potential well (potential barrier) less unit, that the particle could penetrate inside of a barrier. Thus a main condition of formation of a standing wave at once is upset, and the quantum levels fade, being transformed in an ionization continuum. Thus there is a following dilemma. If we want to keep quantized data, we should refuse a tunnel effect, and if we want to keep a tunnel effect - it is necessary to refuse a set of quantum levels of energy. For further it is necessary to be simulated nothing incognizant about this inconsistency. For the solution of this problem will use also fixed Schrodinger equation, though it is necessary to use a temporary equation. Thus we shall treat with a traveling wave, since the standing wave has not property to dive into any encumbrances. By consideration of a tunnel effect enter a permeability coefficient of a barrier:
D=N/N0 (1), where N - number of particles, walk over through a barrier, N0 - number of particles dropping on a barrier. Official physics, long flout above a particle, part by which one should be mirrored from a barrier, part penetrate in a barrier, and the part to leave out, at last, receives the formula:
D=16E/U0(1-E/U0)e^-2l/ [2m(U0-E)]1/2
(2) where E - the general energy of a particle of mass m, passing through a potential
barrier, width l for overcoming which one is indispensable energy U0.
It is supposed, that E<U0 and the classic particle will not
overcome a barrier. But, by putting E=U0 (the classic particle will
overcome a barrier), from (2) it is visible, that thus of D=0, i.e. the
quantum particle is not capable to overcome a barrier. If E>U0,
(2) gives such outcome, which one cannot give reasonable physical sense. D
becomes negative, and in an exponent there is an imaginary value. The
orthodoxes prefer to hide this nonsense, by mark in:
D0=16E/U0(1-E/U0) (3) and considering D0=1. In the total of this fraud receive quite decently expression, though also it wrong. New physics receives the physically interpreted expression that the particle moves on a screw trajectory and the encumbrance can to not note, if it is less than diameter of a trajectory. If an encumbrance large, a part of an orbit of a trajectory stick out outside of an encumbrance:
D=1/2p×Arccos[2(U0/E-1)2-1] (4). It appears, that the particle can overcome a potential barrier an altitude which one is almost peer to double energy of translational motion of a particle. At equalling of energy of a particle and the altitudes of a barrier, overcome it 50 % of particles, remaining are mirrored. If the speech goes about one particle, 50 % of impacts of a particle with a barrier will cause to its reflection, and 50 % will cause to passing through a barrier. It is fair, since new physics negates formation of a standing wave up to a barrier, therefore at each rendezvous of a particle with a barrier, its phase of motion on a screw line will be miscellaneous. Even at an altitude of a barrier only 10 % from energy of a particle, almost 15 % of particles are mirrored from it.
Linear harmonic oscillator.
The official formula for energy of an oscillator:
En=(n+1/2)hn0 (1), where n=0,1,2,3 , n0 - oscillation frequency of an oscillator in a ground state, i.e. oscillator can be only on higher energy levels concerning a ground state. At n¥ the oscillator should receive indefinitely large energy, that is dispossessed of physical sense. The minimum energy of an oscillator on official notions makes hn0/2. The theorists link to this energy one of the fabrications about zero oscillations of atoms at absolute zero of temperature. New physics gives the formula for energy of an oscillator:
En=hn0/2n2=E0/n2 (2). From (2) it is visible, what at n = 1 oscillator will have maximum energy hn0/2, and at n¥ the oscillator loses all energy and does not beam any more (is in a ground state). This fact can be interpreted doubly. Or the electron is immobile, or is gone on circumferential, instead of elliptical orbit, therefore does not beam. In the latter case there is a sense En to use for calculus of electron-binding energy with a nucleus:
Etie=-E0(1-1/n2) (3). At n¥ maximum bond energy (ground state without radiation): Etiemax=-hn0/2. In applying to atom of Hydrogenium it will be 13.6 eV. Comparing the formulas (1) and (2) we see, that the power spectrum of an oscillator in a wave quantum mechanics is limited on the part of low energies (n=0), but is not limited on the part of high energies (permissibles so-called ultra-violet catastrophe). The power spectrum of an oscillator in a corpuscular quantum mechanics, on the contrary, is not limited on the part of low energies (n=¥), but is limited to value hn0/2 on the part of high energies. It completely corresponds to experimentally studied power spectrums of different processes, which one are sharply limited by some maximum rating of energy.