9. FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT

 

Fine structure constant we already mentioned, and here we shall find out that this such. A mechanical moment (angular momentum) of an electron we have defined identical to all microparticles and equal . It is angular momentum on a screw trajectory of an electron. Now we shall count up, to that the own moment of an electron is peer. Here it is necessary to mark, that angular momentum of particles on a screw trajectory official physics assumes for an own angular momentum, since it does not know that all free bodies moves on a screw line. New physics distinguishes the �screw� and own moment of particles. To find the own moment of an electron it is necessary to make the following supposition: of what the fundamental particles consist, these component inside a particle moves with speed of light. You will refer to a relativity theory, which one prohibits motion with speed of light, but I can you assure, that both relativity theory are erratic also it we shall demonstrate later.

Let's record for an own angular momentum of an electron:

L_e=m_ecr_e (1), where m_e - electronic mass, c - speed of light, r_e - classic radius of an electron. Here it is necessary to note, that the sizes of an electron official physics does not know, though sometimes uses classic radius, but does not consider as its true. Guess, that it from 10^-16 cm up to �of Planck radius� - 10^-33 cm, and relativity theory in general considers the sizes of fundamental particles are peer to zero point, differently there are large problems in the theory. The main reason of ignorance is faith in a validity of an error indeterminacy relation of the Heisenberg. To define the size, it is necessary strongly to accelerate a particle. But in this case new physics asserts, that the size of a particle sharply will decrease, therefore in such a way we never shall define it. The sizes of all particles are close to the �classic� sizes of an electron and it will be demonstrated in the chapter about fundamental particles.

Let's substitute in (1) numerical values and we shall receive: L_e=9.1086×10^-28 g×2.9979×10¹⁰ cm×sec^-1× 2.8175×10^-13 cm=7.6936×10^-30 g× cm²× sec^-1. Let's compare this value to a constant of the Planck (angular momentum on a screw trajectory): =1.05443×10^-27ergs×sec. Ratio /L_e=137.05. It is reverse value of a fine structure constant, its tabulared value 137.037. Its normal value a=0.007297. Thus, the fine structure constant demonstrates on how many own angular momentum of an electron less �screw� moment.

Here friend case to be disassembled with a so-called abnormal magnetic moment of an electron. By spectroscopic methods have defined, that the magnetic moment of an electron in atoms of Hydrogenium is not peer in accuracy to a magneton of the Bohr (equalling would demonstrate absence of an own magnetic moment for an electron). The experimentally retrieved ratio of a magnetic moment of an electron to a magneton of the Bohr is equal: m_e/m₀=1.0011616. Official physics calls this magnetic moment as abnormal (it does not correspond to the theories of orthodoxes) and links its appearance to polarization of vacuum (on official notions of vacuum - not empty emptiness). The remarkable fabrication of the Heisenberg about indeterminacy principles has permitted to the theorists to upset any fundamental laws. About these by fraud of official physics we too shall be disassembled later. If to an orbital magnetic moment of an electron mechanically to add its own magnetic moment, the ratio of their sum to a magneton of the Bohr will be 1.0072971, i.e. it is more experimentally retrieved for Hydrogenium. It is explained simplly, looking on a figure 1.

        

 

If the electron was free, it would move on a screw trajectory shown as sideways on a figure 1 continuous line. The tangential velocity is peer this motion to translational speed because of a principle of an equal energy distribution on degree of freedoms. Therefore own magnetic moment of an electron (is natural, and the angular momentum) always coincides a direction of translational motion. To be precise, the magnetic moment of an electron (as is negative charged particle) is directed to the counter party, but in the given problem it has not value. At nearing to a positive proton, which one can have an arbitrary position, the coil of a trajectory of an electron is drawn out in the party of a positive proton, its radius decreases, and the tangential velocity is augmented. In outcome the electron is gone approximately on that trajectory, which one is shown a broken line. As the electron represents the gyro, the axis of its rotation does not depend on a position of orbit around of a nucleus and remains in initial direction. Therefore common magnetic moment of an orbital electron will be peer to the sum of a magneton of the Bohr and projection of an own magnetic moment of an electron to an axis of orbit:

m_e'=m_e×cosg=1.0011616m₀ (2), where g - angle between a direction of the own moment of an electron and direction of an orbital magnetic moment. From (2) angle g=6.32⁰, i.e. the orbital motion of an electron is very similar motion of planets of a solar System. Here I address. attention of the reader, that �abnormal� the magnetic moment is determined only for atoms of Hydrogenium (1947). For mobile electrons it can not define, and for electrons of other atoms and ions do not determine, since the outcomes distinguished from official value of an abnormal magnetic moment of an electron will be received, representing a subject of pride of a modern physics at the expense of obvious adjustment under the answer. New physics considers (and demonstrates it), that the sizes of fundamental particles (and their mass) depend on a running speed, therefore own magnetic moment of an electron inside high-gravity atoms is significant less, than in atom of Hydrogenium.